The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has formally integrated Bitcoin and other digital assets into its global economic reporting framework, reshaping how cryptocurrencies are classified in international finance.
This change is part of the IMF’s latest Balance of Payments Manual (BPM7), released on March 20, which introduces a new approach to categorizing and tracking crypto transactions across borders.
Digital assets are now classified into fungible and non-fungible tokens, with Bitcoin and similar cryptocurrencies treated as capital assets. Since these assets do not have corresponding liabilities, any cross-border transactions involving them will now be recorded in capital accounts as transfers of non-produced assets.
Stablecoins, on the other hand, are recognized as financial instruments, placing them alongside traditional financial assets in economic reports.
The IMF also acknowledges that certain cryptocurrencies, such as Ethereum and Solana, could be categorized as equity-like assets if held by investors across different jurisdictions, making them comparable to foreign equity investments.
Additionally, the new guidelines address staking rewards, suggesting that earnings from staking could be considered similar to dividend payments depending on how the assets are used. This shift signals an evolving perspective on the role of crypto in the global financial system.
Bitcoin’s recent momentum appears far from exhausted, according to a well-followed crypto strategist who believes institutional demand is driving a persistent uptrend that could limit any meaningful pullback.
Robert Mitchnick, who leads BlackRock’s digital assets division, recently reiterated the firm’s stance on Bitcoin allocation during the Bitcoin 2025 conference in Las Vegas.
As Bitcoin flirts with historic price levels, its elusive creator Satoshi Nakamoto is now being counted among the richest individuals on the planet—without ever showing his face.
At the recent Bitcoin 2025 conference, White House advisor David Sacks opened the door to a potential increase in the U.S. government’s Bitcoin holdings — but only if it can be done without adding to the deficit or raising taxes.