Bitcoin’s next big move will depend more on money creation than on missiles or media noise, according to macro strategist Raoul Pal.
In a recent post, the former hedge-fund manager plotted Bitcoin’s price against the world’s broad money supply (global M2) and found that nearly nine-tenths of the coin’s gyrations over the past three years shadowed shifts in liquidity.
That backdrop offers a simple read on today’s Middle-East flare-up. Reports of Israeli strikes on an Iranian gas hub briefly sent oil futures up more than 7 percent and revived talk of shipping disruptions, yet Bitcoin barely twitched—adding a fraction of a percent while stock futures wobbled.
Pal’s takeaway: unless the conflict forces central banks to flood or drain the system, digital-asset traders can expect business as usual.
The liquidity lens also explains why Bitcoin has weathered COVID shocks, rate-hike cycles, and election headlines with the same pattern: knee-jerk volatility followed by a grind that mirrors the size of the global money pie.
For investors, that framework is blunt but useful: track aggregate M2. If it expands, the odds still favor higher BTC prints, even if oil prices, war risk, or tweet-storms make the path noisy in the short run.
Quantum computing is no longer just a theoretical threat to Bitcoin — it’s fast becoming a real one.
A well-known crypto analyst is sounding the alarm on a potential storm brewing for Bitcoin—one that could be fueled not by speculators, but by institutions themselves.
Michael Saylor has hinted that MicroStrategy is about to top up its already-massive Bitcoin reserve, even as the Israel-Iran flare-up keeps global markets on edge.
Bitcoin is facing strong headwinds just shy of its all-time high, with analysts at Swissblock warning that a breakout may be off the table—at least for now.