As the Federal Reserve approaches its next policy meeting, economist George Lagarias from Forvis Mazars is recommending a cautious 25 basis point rate cut.
He argues that a smaller adjustment is preferable to a more substantial 50 basis point reduction, which could be perceived as an excessive reaction to current economic conditions.
Lagarias suggests that a larger rate cut might be misinterpreted as a sign of economic distress, potentially leading to increased uncertainty. He emphasizes that such a move could inadvertently heighten market anxiety and contribute to a negative economic cycle.
While there is growing speculation for a more significant rate cut due to recent data—such as a notable drop in job openings—Lagarias contends that the situation does not warrant such drastic measures. He attributes the slowdown in the job market to supply issues rather than a decline in demand.
This viewpoint aligns with that of other analysts, including Mohit Kumar from Jefferies, who also advises against a dramatic rate cut in the Fed’s upcoming decision.
A proposed U.S. oil tariff could hit foreign producers with $10 billion in costs annually, according to Goldman Sachs.
The stock market may be headed for turmoil as a historic divergence emerges between the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500.
Trump is pushing ahead with aggressive tariffs, setting the stage for economic tensions with both the EU and BRICS.
The US Producer Price Index (PPI) for January revealed a rise of 3.5%, surpassing December’s 3.3%, signaling persistent inflation concerns.