In a significant legal development, Tether and Bitfinex are embroiled in a revised class action lawsuit alleging market manipulation and antitrust violations.
The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of New York, accuses the companies of violating the Commodities Exchange Act through practices that artificially inflated cryptocurrency prices.
Plaintiffs including Matthew Script, Benjamin Leibowitz, Jason Leibowitz, Aaron Leibowitz, and Pinchas Goldshtein claim that Tether’s issuance of USDT, purportedly not fully backed by USD reserves as claimed, created false impressions of market demand.
This alleged scheme, they argue, facilitated trading on credit and loaned funds, driving up prices of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.
The amended complaint, a streamlined version of earlier filings, refines the accusations against Tether and Bitfinex. It focuses on claims of manipulating crypto commodity markets to gain unfair advantages, impacting broader investor confidence and market integrity.
Notably, the lawsuit follows previous legal actions against the companies, indicating ongoing scrutiny of their operational practices amidst the evolving regulatory landscape governing digital assets.
Despite Tether’s denial of the allegations and assertions of meritlessness, the case has garnered attention within the cryptocurrency community and regulatory circles alike.
A U.S. court has handed down a 30-year prison sentence to Mohammed Azharuddin Chhipa, who was found guilty of financing terrorism through cryptocurrency.
A major chapter in crypto’s legal reckoning closed this week as Alex Mashinsky, once a prominent name in digital lending, received a 12-year prison sentence.
Former Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky is asking for a significantly reduced prison sentence ahead of his May 8 sentencing, with his legal team pushing back hard against the U.S. Department of Justice’s call for a 20-year term.
The legal battle against the creators of Samourai Wallet has taken a sharp turn, as defense attorneys accuse federal prosecutors of suppressing a key legal interpretation from the Treasury Department that could dismantle the core of the government’s case.