April brought an unusual twist to the U.S. stock market. The S&P 500 plummeted more than 10% during the month, only to rebound and close within 2% of where it began.
According to technical analyst Subu Trade, this rare combo has only happened five times since 1926 — and each time, a deeper correction followed. Historically, the index dropped an average of over 15% within a year of such an occurrence.
As of May 6, the S&P 500 sat at 5,650 points, dipping 0.64% on the day and breaking a nine-session winning streak — its longest in two decades. The broader index remains down nearly 4% for the year.
Still, interpreting this setup isn’t straightforward. While the historical pattern suggests caution, it’s worth noting the last time this signal flashed was in 1938 — in a vastly different economic landscape.
Today’s market is supported by strong momentum in tech stocks and some bullish technical indicators, including a recent Zweig Breadth Thrust — often a sign of a rally forming.
However, headwinds remain. Trade tensions, a disappointing GDP report, and policy uncertainty — including unusual proposals like tariffs on streaming content — have rattled sentiment. At the same time, Wall Street has started to revise its S&P 500 outlook for 2025 downward, reflecting increased caution across institutional desks.
For now, traders are being advised to watch for clearer confirmation before betting on a bearish move, as conflicting signals keep the outlook murky.
Circle, the issuer behind the USDC stablecoin, is preparing to go public, and sources say BlackRock is gearing up to take a significant piece of the action—possibly acquiring 10% of the offering.
Bybit is making a bold move into the European crypto market after securing regulatory approval under the EU’s MiCA framework.
Nvidia reported strong financial results for the first quarter of 2026 for the period ended April 27, 2025, which led to a 4.8% increase in its shares in after-hours trading.
Elon Musk has stepped down as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), citing the difficulty of reducing federal spending and bureaucracy.