India’s Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) has issued a notice to Binance, demanding a payment of about $86 million for Goods and Services Tax (GST).
This is the DGGI’s first major move against a cryptocurrency firm, marking a significant development in regulatory enforcement.
The notice addresses GST on fees collected from Indian users trading virtual assets on Binance’s platform. Despite Binance’s extensive global presence and substantial market share, it had not registered for GST in India, leading to this regulatory action.
Reports indicate that Binance earned approximately $476 million from transaction fees in India, with these earnings routed through its Seychelles-based subsidiary. In response, Binance has hired local legal counsel in India to resolve the issue.
Earlier this year, Binance also faced a fine from India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) for non-compliance with anti-money laundering regulations. The FIU has stressed the need for improved compliance from Binance under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
This scrutiny aligns with a global trend of increasing regulatory pressure on cryptocurrency exchanges. For instance, Binance was recently charged with tax evasion in Nigeria for avoiding Value-Added Tax (VAT) and Company Income Tax.
Anchorage Digital, a federally chartered crypto custody bank, is urging its institutional clients to move away from major stablecoins like USDC, Agora USD (AUSD), and Usual USD (USD0), recommending instead a shift to the Global Dollar (USDG) — a stablecoin issued by Paxos and backed by a consortium that includes Anchorage itself.
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has voiced concerns over the rise of zero-knowledge (ZK) digital identity projects, specifically warning that systems like World — formerly Worldcoin and backed by OpenAI’s Sam Altman — could undermine pseudonymity in the digital world.
A new report by the European Central Bank (ECB) reveals that digital payment methods continue to gain ground across the euro area, though cash remains a vital part of the consumer payment landscape — particularly for small-value transactions and person-to-person (P2P) payments.
Geopolitical conflict rattles markets, but history shows panic selling crypto in response is usually the wrong move.