Hong Kong legislator Johnny Ng has proposed establishing a legal framework to regulate decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), aiming to boost the web3 sector in the region.
Ng’s proposal follows a recent Hong Kong High Court ruling involving the Mantra DAO, which required six defendants to disclose financial information about the DAO.
This case is notable as it represents one of the first judicial reviews of a DAO globally. Ng believes that creating a clear regulatory framework could attract international investment and talent to Hong Kong’s web3 industry.
The dispute with Mantra DAO centers around asset misappropriation claims. Plaintiff RioDeFi argues that it founded the DAO and had hired two of the six defendants to manage it in 2020.
RioDeFi requested the court to obtain financial records from the DAO, citing issues such as halted reports and unexplained crypto wallet withdrawals.
The defendants, however, contend that producing these documents would be burdensome, citing a lack of resources. They also argued that decision-making power within the DAO rests with OM token holders.
High Court Justice David Lok responded by asserting that the defendants are responsible for maintaining accurate financial records and should provide these details as required.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has made it clear it will no longer involve itself in regulating memecoins—tokens often driven by internet culture, hype, and political branding.
Efforts to bring much-needed legal structure to the U.S. digital asset market took a leap forward with the introduction of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act—a bill designed to lay the groundwork for coherent crypto regulation.
Thailand is preparing to weave digital assets into its tourism and financial infrastructure, starting with a pilot program that would let visitors pay in crypto through card-linked platforms.
Leading voices in the digital asset space are calling on U.S. regulators to break their silence on staking.