A recent congressional hearing meant to advance digital asset regulation instead erupted into political controversy, as lawmakers questioned whether former President Donald Trump could personally benefit from the proposed CLARITY Act.
What began as a discussion around the structure of crypto markets quickly spiraled when Rep. Maxine Waters accused Trump of having undisclosed business ties to the industry—particularly through entities like World Liberty Financial, a crypto platform allegedly linked to his inner circle.
She claimed the bill could pave the way for Trump to leverage regulation for private gain, potentially placing taxpayer dollars “in his digital wallet.”
Amid these concerns, Democratic members called for a formal inquiry into Trump’s financial connections to crypto ventures.
Former CFTC Chair Timothy Massad supported the push, warning that any regulatory framework lacking transparency around political entanglements would damage the sector’s credibility.
Waters also raised alarms about national security risks, criticizing the bill for failing to address fraud and protect retail investors. Despite strong pushback, the CLARITY Act is expected to move toward a committee markup by June 10.
While another bill—the GENIUS Act, targeting stablecoin oversight—has already passed, this latest debate suggests crypto regulation may now be shaped as much by politics as by policy.
South Korea’s presidential race ended with a decisive win for Lee Jae Myung, who secured 49.42% of the vote on June 4, 2025.
California is preparing to experiment with cryptocurrency in its government operations.
Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin has received the green light from the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), paving the way for its use in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC).
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has made it clear it will no longer involve itself in regulating memecoins—tokens often driven by internet culture, hype, and political branding.