A judge in Shanghai's People's Court recently clarified China's legal stance on virtual currency through an article on the court's WeChat account.
Her remarks, stemming from a 2017 business dispute, offer insight into the country’s uncertain cryptocurrency regulations.
In the case, an agricultural company sued an investment firm for failing to deliver a cryptocurrency token despite a 300,000 yuan ($44,400) payment. The court ruled that both parties were at fault, with the investment firm ordered to return 250,000 yuan.
Judge Sun Jie stated that while virtual currencies aren’t illegal to hold, they should be considered virtual commodities with property attributes, not legal tender. She emphasized that commercial entities are prohibited from engaging in virtual currency investments or issuing tokens.
The judge also warned about the risks of virtual currencies like Bitcoin, which could disrupt financial systems and facilitate illegal activities such as money laundering, fraud, and pyramid schemes. She cautioned individuals and businesses against participating in cryptocurrency transactions, as they might lack legal protection.
China’s crackdown on virtual currency exchanges began in 2017, and in 2021, authorities tightened restrictions, though personal crypto ownership remains legal.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has made it clear it will no longer involve itself in regulating memecoins—tokens often driven by internet culture, hype, and political branding.
Efforts to bring much-needed legal structure to the U.S. digital asset market took a leap forward with the introduction of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act—a bill designed to lay the groundwork for coherent crypto regulation.
Thailand is preparing to weave digital assets into its tourism and financial infrastructure, starting with a pilot program that would let visitors pay in crypto through card-linked platforms.
Leading voices in the digital asset space are calling on U.S. regulators to break their silence on staking.