{"id":154238,"date":"2025-03-28T20:00:21","date_gmt":"2025-03-28T18:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/?p=154238"},"modified":"2025-03-28T17:37:47","modified_gmt":"2025-03-28T15:37:47","slug":"sec-drops-crypto-lawsuits-but-keeps-ripple-case-alive-why","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/sec-drops-crypto-lawsuits-but-keeps-ripple-case-alive-why\/","title":{"rendered":"SEC Drops Crypto Lawsuits but Keeps Ripple Case Alive – Why?"},"content":{"rendered":"
The agency officially dismissed cases against Kraken, Cumberland, and Consensys, raising questions about why Ripple was left out. Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett addressed<\/a><\/strong> this issue on X, offering insights into the SEC\u2019s ongoing legal battle with Ripple.<\/p>\n Eleanor Terrett highlighted in a recent post that the SEC\u2019s decision to exclude Ripple while settling with other firms was not unexpected. She noted that Ripple\u2019s legal situation differs from the other cases, making its resolution more complex.<\/p>\n One key distinction is the presence of an existing injunction against Ripple, which the SEC must navigate before withdrawing its appeal. To proceed, the agency would need to request Judge Torres to lift the injunction, a necessary step before moving forward with a potential resolution.<\/p>\n