{"id":153493,"date":"2025-03-22T15:00:57","date_gmt":"2025-03-22T13:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/?p=153493"},"modified":"2025-03-22T13:04:54","modified_gmt":"2025-03-22T11:04:54","slug":"binance-warns-of-airdrop-manipulation-as-trust-in-crypto-rewards-declines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/binance-warns-of-airdrop-manipulation-as-trust-in-crypto-rewards-declines\/","title":{"rendered":"Binance Warns of Airdrop Manipulation as Trust in Crypto Rewards Declines"},"content":{"rendered":"

According to the analysis<\/a><\/strong>, shrinking rewards, insider manipulation, and bot-driven exploitation are eroding trust in the model. What was once seen as a way to distribute wealth and incentivize participation is now at risk of becoming a system that benefits only a select few.<\/p>\n

While some airdrops, like Pudgy Penguins and Hyperliquid, received high praise for their execution, others sparked outrage. Redstone slashed its promised community allocation from 9.5% to 5%, leading to backlash and a poor sentiment score. Scroll\u2019s vague eligibility rules and Kaito\u2019s insider-heavy distribution further fueled skepticism. Many projects fail to establish clear guidelines, creating uncertainty that leaves users feeling excluded or misled.<\/p>\n

Sybil attacks, where bots accumulate large amounts of tokens, remain a major issue. Technical failures, such as Magic Eden\u2019s flawed claim process, have only worsened user frustration. Binance warns that without reforms, these problems could threaten the legitimacy of airdrops altogether. The report also points to an increasing trend of influential investors quickly dumping their allocations, undermining long-term community growth and token stability.<\/p>\n