{"id":143681,"date":"2024-12-01T11:00:08","date_gmt":"2024-12-01T09:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/?p=143681"},"modified":"2024-11-30T19:45:14","modified_gmt":"2024-11-30T17:45:14","slug":"uk-court-rejects-craig-wrights-appeal-upholding-ruling-against-his-bitcoin-authorship-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/uk-court-rejects-craig-wrights-appeal-upholding-ruling-against-his-bitcoin-authorship-claim\/","title":{"rendered":"UK Court Rejects Craig Wright’s Appeal, Upholding Ruling Against His Bitcoin Authorship Claim"},"content":{"rendered":"
The decision<\/a> <\/strong>marks another blow to Wright’s ongoing claims of Bitcoin<\/a> <\/strong>authorship.<\/p>\n On November 28, the court dismissed Wright\u2019s appeal, ruling that his arguments lacked merit. Lord Justice Arnold stated there was no reasonable basis for an appeal and confirmed that Wright\u2019s evidence did not support his claim to be the author of the Bitcoin whitepaper. Earlier this year, after a 22-day trial, a judge had concluded that Wright could not substantiate his assertions of authorship, with expert testimony undermining his case.<\/p>\n Despite Wright\u2019s claims of judicial bias and improper handling of evidence, the court rejected these accusations. The ruling emphasized that the trial judge had ensured a fair process, dismissing Wright\u2019s complaints as disagreements with the legal reasoning rather than valid grounds for appeal.<\/p>\n