{"id":140444,"date":"2024-10-24T13:30:58","date_gmt":"2024-10-24T10:30:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/?p=140444"},"modified":"2024-10-24T03:00:06","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T00:00:06","slug":"could-banning-bitcoin-ignite-a-70k-rally-insights-from-anthony-pompliano","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/could-banning-bitcoin-ignite-a-70k-rally-insights-from-anthony-pompliano\/","title":{"rendered":"Could Banning Bitcoin Ignite a $70K Rally? Insights from Anthony Pompliano"},"content":{"rendered":"

He argued<\/a> <\/strong>that strict regulations from a hostile political leader could actually boost Bitcoin<\/a> <\/strong>adoption, as seen in countries like Pakistan, Nigeria, and China, where crackdowns have led to increased public interest.<\/p>\n

Pompliano noted that attempts to restrict Bitcoin often backfire. He stated, \u201cA hardline stance against Bitcoin might raise its price,\u201d highlighting how bans can drive demand. He also suggested that Kamala Harris and Donald Trump have similar views on cryptocurrency regulation, countering the notion that Harris is more anti-Bitcoin.<\/p>\n

Emphasizing Bitcoin\u2019s decentralized nature, Pompliano claimed that no government can truly diminish its value. He argued that a U.S. ban would harm users more than Bitcoin itself, thanks to its resilient structure.<\/p>\n