{"id":155734,"date":"2025-04-30T16:19:46","date_gmt":"2025-04-30T13:19:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/?page_id=155734"},"modified":"2026-01-21T15:57:41","modified_gmt":"2026-01-21T13:57:41","slug":"rating-methodology","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/","title":{"rendered":"Methodology: How We Evaluate Blockchain and Crypto Projects"},"content":{"rendered":"

CryptoDnes evaluates blockchain projects through our CHAIN Analysis Framework<\/strong>\u2122 \u2013 a system designed to identify genuine innovation and sustainable value. Unlike traditional rating systems focused primarily on market metrics, our methodology prioritizes technological innovation, real-world application, and long-term sustainability factors.<\/p>\n

Projects receive a Dynamic Rating between 1-10<\/strong> (with decimal precision) that evolves alongside industry developments and project maturation.<\/p>\n

Core Evaluation Pillars<\/h2>\n

Comprehensive Assessment<\/h3>\n

\"\"We reject one-dimensional analysis in favor of a multifaceted approach that examines both quantitative metrics and qualitative aspects of each project.<\/p>\n

Our analysts conduct thorough investigations across eight distinct dimensions, combining technical audits, governance evaluation, and practical implementation assessment.<\/p>\n

Forward-Looking Perspective<\/h3>\n

Rather than emphasizing historical performance, our methodology identifies projects positioned to thrive amid emerging technological paradigms and regulatory landscapes. This anticipatory approach helps readers discover value before mainstream recognition.<\/p>\n

Technological Innovation Priority<\/h3>\n

We assign substantial importance to genuine technological advancement over short-term market performance. Projects introducing novel solutions to significant blockchain limitations receive enhanced consideration in our framework.<\/p>\n

Sustainability Integration<\/h3>\n

Projects demonstrating environmental consciousness, energy efficiency, and alignment with broader sustainability goals receive favorable evaluation. We recognize that long-term viability increasingly depends on responsible resource utilization.<\/p>\n

The CHAIN Analysis Framework\u2122<\/h2>\n

Our proprietary evaluation model examines projects across eight critical dimensions, each represented by a letter in our CHAIN<\/strong> methodology:<\/p>\n

C: Code Foundation<\/h3>\n

We conduct a comprehensive assessment of project codebases, examining:<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
    \n
  • <\/i> Architecture elegance and efficiency<\/li>\n
  • <\/i> Novel cryptographic implementations<\/li>\n
  • <\/i> Code audit results and security protocols<\/li>\n
  • <\/i> Test coverage and vulnerability management<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    Evaluation Scale: Experimental \u2192 Revolutionary<\/em><\/p>\n

    H: Human Capital<\/h3>\n

    We evaluate the teams behind projects with emphasis on:<\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    \n
    \n
      \n
    • <\/i> Core developer expertise and credentials<\/li>\n
    • <\/i> Leadership experience in relevant domains<\/li>\n
    • <\/i> Distributed vs. centralized development approach<\/li>\n
    • <\/i> Knowledge transfer mechanisms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

      Evaluation Scale: Emerging \u2192 Established<\/em><\/p>\n

      A: Adoption Trajectory<\/h3>\n

      We analyze real-world implementation through:<\/p>\n

      \n
      \n
      \n
      \n
        \n
      • <\/i> Active address growth patterns<\/li>\n
      • <\/i> Transaction volume trends<\/li>\n
      • <\/i> User retention metrics<\/li>\n
      • <\/i> Institutional integration progress<\/li>\n
      • <\/i> Cross-chain bridge activity<\/li>\n
      • <\/i> Geographic distribution of nodes<\/li>\n
      • <\/i> Validator diversity metrics<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

        Evaluation Scale: Speculative \u2192 Mainstream<\/em><\/p>\n

        I: Innovative Capacity<\/h3>\n

        We assess technological differentiation through:<\/p>\n

        \n
        \n
        \n
        \n
          \n
        • <\/i> Unique problem-solving approaches<\/li>\n
        • <\/i> Patent applications and intellectual property<\/li>\n
        • <\/i> Academic research partnerships<\/li>\n
        • <\/i> Protocol improvement proposal quality<\/li>\n
        • <\/i> Scalability solutions beyond existing paradigms<\/li>\n
        • <\/i> Cross-chain interoperability advancements<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

          Evaluation Scale: Derivative \u2192 Pioneering<\/em><\/p>\n

          N: Network Economics<\/h3>\n

          We evaluate economic design via:<\/p>\n

          \n
          \n
          \n
          \n
            \n
          • <\/i> Token utility models and value creation mechanisms<\/li>\n
          • <\/i> Supply distribution equity and concentration risk<\/li>\n
          • <\/i> Inflation\/deflation dynamics and monetary policy<\/li>\n
          • <\/i> Fee structures and incentive alignment<\/li>\n
          • <\/i> Governance token functionality<\/li>\n
          • <\/i> Long-term economic sustainability<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

            Evaluation Scale: Extractive \u2192 Regenerative<\/em><\/p>\n

            Advanced Evaluation Dimensions<\/h2>\n

            Quantum Resistance Readiness<\/h3>\n

            As quantum computing advances, we assess projects for:<\/p>\n

              \n
            • Post-quantum cryptographic implementations<\/li>\n
            • Quantum vulnerability mitigation strategies<\/li>\n
            • Upgrade paths for quantum-resistant algorithms<\/li>\n
            • Research partnerships with quantum computing initiatives<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              Climate Impact Profile<\/h3>\n

              We evaluate environmental considerations through:<\/p>\n

                \n
              • Energy consumption metrics per transaction<\/li>\n
              • Carbon offset initiatives and reporting transparency<\/li>\n
              • Transition plans toward renewable energy sources<\/li>\n
              • Implementation of efficient consensus mechanisms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                Decentralization Reality Index<\/h3>\n

                Beyond marketing claims, we measure actual decentralization via:<\/p>\n

                  \n
                • Gini coefficient of token distribution<\/li>\n
                • Governance proposal participation rates<\/li>\n
                • Node distribution across jurisdictions<\/li>\n
                • Protocol change implementation processes<\/li>\n
                • Resistance to censorship and single points of failure<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                  Regulatory Adaptation Capacity<\/h3>\n

                  We assess preparedness for evolving compliance landscapes:<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  • Multi-jurisdictional regulatory engagement<\/li>\n
                  • KYC\/AML framework implementation options<\/li>\n
                  • Privacy-preserving compliance solutions<\/li>\n
                  • Legal entity structure and jurisdictional strategy<\/li>\n
                  • Regulatory disclosure transparency<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                    Sector-Specific Evaluation Frameworks<\/h2>\n

                    To ensure a consistent and objective evaluation, CryptoDnes applies sector-specific criteria tailored to the unique characteristics of each blockchain project category.<\/p>\n

                    The following frameworks outline how different types of projects:<\/p>\n

                    \n
                    Layer-1 Networks<\/span>DeFi Protocols<\/span>Real-World Asset Tokenization<\/span>Artificial Intelligence Integration<\/span>Metaverse & Gaming Ecosystems<\/span><\/div>\n
                    \n
                    \n

                    Base blockchain platforms undergo specialized assessment of:<\/strong><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    • Transaction finality mechanisms<\/li>\n
                    • State management approaches<\/li>\n
                    • Sharding implementation sophistication<\/li>\n
                    • Validator incentive structures<\/li>\n
                    • Governance automation capabilities<\/li>\n
                    • Cross-chain communication protocols<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
                      \n

                      Decentralized finance projects face scrutiny regarding:<\/strong><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      • Capital efficiency innovations<\/li>\n
                      • Oracle implementation security<\/li>\n
                      • Risk management capabilities<\/li>\n
                      • Real-yield generation mechanisms<\/li>\n
                      • MEV protection measures<\/li>\n
                      • Composability with existing ecosystems<\/li>\n
                      • Insurance and risk mitigation options<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
                        \n

                        RWA projects are evaluated based on:<\/strong><\/p>\n

                          \n
                        • Legal framework robustness<\/li>\n
                        • Custody solution security<\/li>\n
                        • Asset verification mechanisms<\/li>\n
                        • Fractionalization capabilities<\/li>\n
                        • Secondary market liquidity provisions<\/li>\n
                        • Regulatory compliance infrastructure<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
                          \n

                          AI-blockchain hybrid projects receive specialized assessment of:<\/strong><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          • Decentralized computation frameworks<\/li>\n
                          • Data marketplace functionality<\/li>\n
                          • Model ownership and verification systems<\/li>\n
                          • AI governance mechanisms<\/li>\n
                          • Privacy-preserving inference capabilities<\/li>\n
                          • Token incentives for quality data provision<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
                            \n

                            Virtual world projects undergo evaluation regarding:<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              \n
                            • Asset interoperability standards<\/li>\n
                            • Creator economy infrastructure<\/li>\n
                            • Digital property rights frameworks<\/li>\n
                            • Governance mechanisms for virtual spaces<\/li>\n
                            • Technical performance under load conditions<\/li>\n
                            • User acquisition and retention mechanisms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

                              Research Methodology<\/h2>\n

                              Primary Source Integration<\/h3>\n

                              Our analysts collect data directly from:<\/p>\n

                                \n
                              • GitHub repositories and developer forums<\/li>\n
                              • Project documentation and technical papers<\/li>\n
                              • Node operation and validator participation<\/li>\n
                              • Smart contract interaction metrics<\/li>\n
                              • Governance proposal systems<\/li>\n
                              • Conference presentations and academic publications<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                Advanced On-Chain Analytics<\/h3>\n

                                We employ proprietary algorithms to analyze:<\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                • Token velocity patterns<\/li>\n
                                • Smart contract interaction graphs<\/li>\n
                                • Value flow distribution maps<\/li>\n
                                • Network congestion response characteristics<\/li>\n
                                • Fee market dynamics<\/li>\n
                                • Liquidity distribution across DEX\/CEX venues<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                  Sentiment Analysis Integration<\/h3>\n

                                  We incorporate natural language processing across:<\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  • Developer communication channels<\/li>\n
                                  • Community governance discussions<\/li>\n
                                  • Social media sentiment trends<\/li>\n
                                  • Technical documentation evolution<\/li>\n
                                  • Conference and event presentations<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                    Dynamic Rating Formulation<\/h2>\n

                                    Rather than applying rigid numerical weightings, CryptoDnes employs a dynamic rating algorithm that adapts to changing market conditions and technological developments. This approach recognizes that the relative importance of different factors evolves alongside the blockchain ecosystem itself.<\/p>\n

                                    Ratings undergo continual refinement through:<\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    • Data refreshes for market metrics<\/li>\n
                                    • Monthly code activity assessment<\/li>\n
                                    • Quarterly fundamental reassessment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                      Editorial Oversight<\/h2>\n

                                      Every rating undergoes a rigorous multi-stage review process:<\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                      \n
                                        \n
                                      1. Technical Committee Review<\/strong> \u2013 Blockchain engineers and cryptographers validate technical assessments<\/li>\n
                                      2. Editorial Board Verification<\/strong> \u2013 Senior editors ensure consistency and objectivity<\/li>\n
                                      3. Public Blockchain Validation<\/strong> \u2013 Key metrics are verified against public blockchain data<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

                                        CryptoDnes maintains strict editorial independence, with absolute separation between analytical teams and business operations. Analysts must disclose all digital asset holdings and recuse themselves from evaluating projects where conflicts exist.<\/p>\n

                                        Methodology Evolution<\/h2>\n

                                        The CryptoDnes evaluation framework undergoes continuous improvement through:<\/p>\n

                                        Quarterly Methodology Symposiums<\/h3>\n

                                        Our research team collaborates with external blockchain specialists, economists, and regulatory experts to refine and enhance our approach.<\/p>\n

                                        Open Consultation Process<\/h3>\n

                                        Blockchain projects may submit methodological suggestions through our transparent improvement proposal system, ensuring our approach remains relevant.<\/p>\n

                                        Recent Framework Enhancements<\/h2>\n
                                        \n
                                        \n
                                        \n
                                        \n
                                        March 2025 \ud83d\uddd3\ufe0f<\/div>\n
                                        \n

                                        Introduced specialized evaluation criteria for Artificial Intelligence\/blockchain integration projects and expanded sustainability metrics.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

                                        \n
                                        \n
                                        \n
                                        January 2025 \ud83d\uddd3\ufe0f<\/div>\n
                                        \n

                                        Implemented advanced on-chain analytics for more granular assessment of network health indicators and user adoption patterns.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

                                        \n
                                        \n
                                        \n
                                        November 2024 \ud83d\uddd3\ufe0f<\/div>\n
                                        \n

                                        Added quantum resistance evaluation framework to address emerging concerns about cryptographic security in post-quantum computing environments.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                        CryptoDnes evaluates blockchain projects through our CHAIN Analysis Framework\u2122 \u2013 a system designed to identify genuine innovation and sustainable value. Unlike traditional rating systems focused primarily on market metrics, our methodology prioritizes technological innovation, real-world application, and long-term sustainability factors. Projects receive a Dynamic Rating between 1-10 (with decimal precision) that evolves alongside industry developments […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_lmt_disableupdate":"no","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-155734","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nMethodology: How We Evaluate Blockchain and Crypto Projects - CryptoDnes EN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Learn how CryptoDnes' experts rate crypto and blockchain projects using a transparent, data-driven evaluation framework.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Methodology: How We Evaluate Blockchain and Crypto Projects - CryptoDnes EN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Learn how CryptoDnes' experts rate crypto and blockchain projects using a transparent, data-driven evaluation framework.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CryptoDnes EN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-21T13:57:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/rating-methodology\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/rating-methodology\\\/\",\"name\":\"Methodology: How We Evaluate Blockchain and Crypto Projects - CryptoDnes EN\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/rating-methodology\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/rating-methodology\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2022\\\/08\\\/logo-8.svg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-30T13:19:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-21T13:57:41+00:00\",\"description\":\"Learn how CryptoDnes' experts rate crypto and blockchain projects using a transparent, data-driven evaluation framework.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/rating-methodology\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/rating-methodology\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/rating-methodology\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/rating-methodology\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Methodology\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"CryptoDnes EN\",\"description\":\"Crypto News, Bitcoin Analysis and More\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"CryptoDnes EN\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/logo-cryptodnes.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/logo-cryptodnes.svg\",\"caption\":\"CryptoDnes EN\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cryptodnes.bg\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Methodology: How We Evaluate Blockchain and Crypto Projects - CryptoDnes EN","description":"Learn how CryptoDnes' experts rate crypto and blockchain projects using a transparent, data-driven evaluation framework.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Methodology: How We Evaluate Blockchain and Crypto Projects - CryptoDnes EN","og_description":"Learn how CryptoDnes' experts rate crypto and blockchain projects using a transparent, data-driven evaluation framework.","og_site_name":"CryptoDnes EN","article_modified_time":"2026-01-21T13:57:41+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/","url":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/","name":"Methodology: How We Evaluate Blockchain and Crypto Projects - CryptoDnes EN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2022\/08\/logo-8.svg","datePublished":"2025-04-30T13:19:46+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-21T13:57:41+00:00","description":"Learn how CryptoDnes' experts rate crypto and blockchain projects using a transparent, data-driven evaluation framework.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/#primaryimage","url":"","contentUrl":""},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/rating-methodology\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Methodology"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/","name":"CryptoDnes EN","description":"Crypto News, Bitcoin Analysis and More","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/#organization","name":"CryptoDnes EN","url":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/logo-cryptodnes.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/logo-cryptodnes.svg","caption":"CryptoDnes EN"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/155734","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155734"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/155734\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":187303,"href":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/155734\/revisions\/187303"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cryptodnes.bg\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155734"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}